Thursday, January 5, 2012

Blue Shield of California Purposefully Ignores and Denies Valid Claims


It speaks volumes about a health insurance when every single claim I have ends with me filing a complaint with the California Department of Insurance against Blue Shield of California. Detailed below is my latest plight. I hope it will help you to fight for the coverage you are already paying for.

I have $3,343 in legitimate medical claims for 2011 that Blue Shield of California has paid nothing on or even credited in full towards my deductible. I have five claims from my dermatologist who is in network with Blue Shield of California and listed by them as a preferred provider. These claims are for medically necessary non-surgical treatment of TMJ and medically necessary treatment of the maxilla and mandible (jaw joints and jaw bones), which are covered in my health care plan on page 41. The claims are for $1650, $800, $250, $400 and $350. Blue Shield of California has not paid one dime on any of these claims. On each of these claims they have given me $5.58 credit toward my deductible for each claim regardless of the amount. My dermatologist had to submit these claims multiple times because Blue Shield of California representatives would repeatedly state that there was no record of the claim being received. I have verified dates of submission with my dermatologist. Blue Shield of California purposefully and willfully ignored these claims.

I also have a $543.00 claim from UCLA Oral Radiology. I have mailed and faxed this claim. Blue Shield of California denied ever receiving the claim even though I have fax confirmation that it was sent. It was not until my recent complaint with the California Department of Insurance that they acknowledged this claim for the first time, more than four months after it was initially submitted. 

The response from the Blue Shield of California representative in regards to my complaint with the California Department of Insurance was laughable. She did not even list the correct name of my dermatologist, instead listing another doctor I've never been treated by. She continued Blue Shield of California's policy of willful and intentional evasion by not addressing half the complaint and claiming that what had been processed was correct. 

Let me ask this question of Blue Shield of California, when a patient has $3,343 in legitimate medical bills from doctors who are preferred providers and in network and Blue Shield of California doesn't pay a dime, what is the point of me paying for health insurance? Furthermore, how does a patient ever reach his or her deductible when regardless of the amount of the claim, he or she is only credited $5.58 for each claim toward the deductible?!

Blue Shield of California willfully and intentionally evades their legal obligations by purposely stating that claims have not been received when they've been sent multiple times, by not paying claims for legitimate medical services from in-network providers and by purposely not crediting those claims toward the patient's deductible.  

The grievance process is a joke. I submitted a grievance first to Blue Shield of California before filing a complaint with the California Department of Insurance. Blue Shield of California guarantees they will respond within thirty calendar days. I never received any response from Blue Shield of California. 

Blue Shield of California's PR department is also very busy touting that they are a non-profit and they've committed to only taking two percent profit and any profit over that will be sent back to the customers. I've received two of these refunds on my monthly health premium recently. One refund was for about thirty dollars and the other one was for forty dollars. What a great racket Blue Shield of California has going! Refund customers seventy dollars but deny $3,343 in legitimate medical claims! And of course Blue Shield of California increased my health insurance premium for 2012 even though they have not paid one dime on any of these claims. 

I am currently in the midst of a complaint with the California Department of Insurance over these claims. I will continue to update this post. I encourage anyone who is dealing with the unethical and illegal behavior of Blue Shield of California to file a complaint with your state's department of insurance. 

Sunday, December 18, 2011

Colossal Incompetence: UCLA Oral and Maxillofacial Department


If you want to be ripped off and jerked around, please come to the UCLA Oral and Maxillofacial department. Dealing with them is enough to put you in the psychiatric ward at UCLA. I have an Oral and Maxillofacial surgeon in Beverly Hills. He's great. He takes my insurance, which is Blue Shield of California PPO, his staff is competent and they never overcharge me.

Unfortunately for me, he wanted me to see the head of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery at UCLA for a second opinion. This is where my nightmare would begin. The UCLA Oral and Maxillofacial department informed me that I would not be able to get an appointment for two months. Then they told me that they did not take my insurance. That's interesting. Blue Shield of California is one of the largest insurers in the state of California and yet UCLA does not accept their insurance. I asked how much the consultation would be since I was going to be forced to pay out of pocket. The patient coordinator told me $75.

I was in a lot of pain and waiting for my appointment was misery. With about a month to go I emailed the head of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery asking him if there was any possibility of getting a sooner appointment and explained my situation. I had pain running down my neck and up the side of my head in addition to the severe jaw and teeth pain I'd been dealing with. He could not have cared less. He suggested I see another doctor at the clinic, which wasn't an option as I'd been specifically referred to him. He also said he would put me on their cancellation list. I never heard anything else.

The day of my appointment finally arrived. I waited two hours past my appointment time in a dingy waiting room that reminded me of a mental institution. I filled out about ten pages of paperwork and signed my life away. Then the patient coordinator informed me that the consultation would be $200. I explained that I'd been told it would be $75. He said there was nothing he could do. He did inform me that an intern had taken my call the day I made the appointment. How interesting. Wonder why UCLA would have an intern doing the job of a paid employee?!

I made sure to get the name of the office manager to make a complaint as I felt strongly I should not have to pay for the mistake of an intern. I contacted the office manager, Karen Johnson multiple times via phone and email. I received no response. I sent a letter of complaint to the Dean of the UCLA School of Dentistry. I received a letter from the Associate Dean that they would look into the matter. Thirty days later when I'd heard nothing I left a voicemail for the Associate Dean. He responded back immediately saying that Ms. Johnson would handle the issue, and for the first time I received a response from her. What a pleasant surprise.

In the meantime, she'd managed to bill my insurance for the claim, which is even more interesting because UCLA Oral and Maxillofacial told me they did not accept my insurance. My insurance processed and paid the claim and still I received no refund.

It's been three and a half months. I have continued to send multiple emails and phone calls to the office manager Karen Johnson and have received nothing but excuses and lies. Dealing with UCLA is the epitome of hell. If you need Oral and Maxillofacial services, please stay far far away unless you like being lied to, jerked around and ripped off.

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Anastasia of Beverly Hills Illumin8 with Youthful Synergy Complex Bronzer



The Illumin8 with Youthful Synergy Complex Bronzer from Anastasia of Beverly Hills retails for $29.00 and can be found at Anastasia of Beverly Hills stores as well as on their website at http://anastasia.net/. There are two shades, Sun Kissed for fairer complexions and Sun Bronzed for medium complexions. 


What I love about this bronzer before having tried it is that it's cruelty-free, meaning that there is no testing on animals. As a vegan, cruelty-free products are something I make a special point of purchasing. It is also paraben free and hypoallergenic, which are both bonuses. 


After using this bronzer several times I absolutely love it!! It's a fast and easy way to give your face a bronzed or sun-tanned glow. It does not come with an application sponge or brush so you will need your own. I tried both a sponge and a brush. It absolutely goes on best with a brush. I used the Sun Kissed shade, which gives a tanned and healthy-looking glow on fair skin. 


A great use for the Illuin8 Bronzer is for the woman who spray tans. I spend most of the summer spray tanning and while my spray tan lasts about a week on my body, it lasts about a day on my face. Using a face bronzer like this one is a great way to maintain a bronzed face that will match your spray tanned physique. 


Product Info from the Anastasia of Beverly Hills website...


Get an instant sun-kissed glow without the sun! Illumin8 Bronzer is the first clinically and consumer-tested bronzing powder that hydrates the skin and helps reduce the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles.

CLINICAL RESULTS
Clinically proven to hydrate skin and reduce the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles.

Results after 4 WEEKS of daily use:
78% reported skin appeared SMOOTHER.
73% reported skin appeared ILLUMIN8.
68% reported skin appeared FIRMER.



INGREDIENTS TALC, TRIETHYLHEXANOIN, ZINC STEARATE, SILICA, LAUROYL LYSINE, CAPRYLIC/CAPRIC TRIGLYCERIDE, PHYTOSTERYL MACADAMIATE, BORON NITRIDE, ALTHAEA OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT, MELISSA OFFICINALIS LEAF EXTRACT, VACCINIUM MYRTILLUS LEAF EXTRACT, CAMELLIA SINENSIS LEAF EXTRACT, NYLON-12, MAGNESIUM CARBONATE, WATER/EAU/AQUA, ETHOXYDIGLYCOL, BARIUM SULFATE, PEAT EXTRACT, PALMITOYL HEXAPEPTIDE-14, GOLD, POTASSIUM SORBATE, POLYMETHYLSILSESQUIOXANE/BENZIMIDAZOLE DIAMOND COPOLYMER, TOCOPHERYL ACETATE, ALARIA ESCULENTA EXTRACT, BUTYLENE GLYCOL, SEA WHIP EXTRACT, TETRAHEXYLDECYL ASCORBATE, RETINYL PALMITATE, PANTHENYL TRIACETATE, CAPRYLYL GLYCOL, PHENOXYETHANOL, HEXYLENE GLYCOL, MAY CONTAIN/PEUT CONTENIR: (+/-) MICA, TITANIUM DIOXIDE (CI 77891), IRON OXIDES (CI 77491, CI 77492, CI 77499), BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE (CI 77163) <10859>

HYPOALLERGENIC | HYPOALLERGENIQUE
DERMATOLOGIST TESTED | DERMATOLOGUE TESTES
PARABEN FREE | SANS PARABENES
FREE OF ARTIFICIAL DYES | SANS TEINTURE ARTIFICIELLE
FRAGRANCE FREE | SANS PARFUM


Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Russell Armstrong Dead Of An Apparent Suicide


Wow. I'm floored by this news.

From the Huffington Post...

Russell Armstrong's apparent suicide Monday evening has us wondering: Was his upcoming divorce from reality star Taylor Armstrong partially to blame?
Russell's lawyer Ronald Richards told TMZ that Russell was "extremely bummed out about the divorce with Taylor," but that his financial woes may also have been a factor. The investment banker and venture capitalist filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2005 and was recently sued for $1.5 million by one of his former clients.
Taylor, who stars in the "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills," filed for divorce last month after five years of marriage. The Armstrongs' ongoing marital problems were a focal point on the first season of the show, and their marriage counseling sessions were to be featured on the upcoming season, which is scheduled to premier September 5. Bravo TV has not yet indicated how it will handle the footage in light of Russell's death.
Following the divorce filing, Taylor accused her estranged spouse of physical and verbal abuse, which created a media frenzy given her advocacy for domestic abuse victims. Russell responded to the allegations in People magazine.
"Did I push her? Yes, maybe things happened in the heat of the moment, but it was during a time in our lives that was not characteristic of who we were," he said in late July 2011. "This show has literally pushed us to the limit."

Russell's ex-wife Barbara Frederickson, with whom he has a 13-year-old son, blames Taylor for his death.
“I don’t care for her at all. I think she’s the reason for this,” she told RadarOnline. "I think she drove him into financial stress and it just ruined him.”
Russell has two other children--a five-year-old daughter, Kennedy, with Taylor, and an 11-year-old son with former fiancee Milette Fields.
Taylor's manager's office indicated that a statement by Taylor was being prepared. According to RadarOnline, she is 'hysterical' after learning about the death Monday night.She has reportedly not yet told their daughter, Kennedy."

Part of what is so disturbing for me about this is that I just saw them as a family Sunday before last. I happened to be at Holmby Park and heard the familiar voice of Taylor Armstrong. It's always weird when you watch someone on a television program regularly and then see them in real life. She was clearly annoyed. They'd just gotten out of a silver Mercedes coupe, and her daughter stepped a little too far out into the street. She yelled at her for it and then grabbed her in a huff storming up the sidewalk. It was of those moments that makes you realize we're all human, and we all get out of sorts. Russell followed at a good distance behind them. Taylor seemed to completely ignore him. Their real life, which I viewed only a few moments of in the park, definitely didn't seem much different from what I'd seen on the television show. 
The next time I came around the park on my walk Taylor was gone and Russell was sitting by himself in the kid's play area watching his daughter play by herself. 

Suicide is so tragic. I cannot imagine being in such a dark place as to end my own life. I think about the three children that are left behind. I pray for him and his children. May they all have peace in this difficult time. 

Saturday, August 13, 2011

Screaming Toddlers and Their Rude Parents

Ugh. This is a rant, a rave, a gripe, whatever you like to call it. When I became single one of the things I realized I was going to miss the most was going out to dinner on Saturday night so I made a promise to myself that I would continue to take myself out to dinner once a week. The Veggie Grill in Santa Monica has been my comfort spot as a newly single person. It's not a sit-down formal restaurant so it's not an awkward place to have a meal alone.

Usually, it's a pleasant experience. They play good music, the food is good (although the Sweetheart fries were cold tonight) and it has a pretty pleasant atmosphere. I often take a book with me, and it's become my Saturday evening "newly single" routine.

Sadly, tonight it was ruined by a couple with two children, one of whom, a toddler, was screaming bloody murder. I don't understand why parents in L.A. are so selfish and rude. The mother started out by telling this toddler to use her inside voice. I doubt this toddler has even the slightest grasp of the English language let alone understanding what an "inside voice" is. As the toddler shrieked louder, the mother continue to try to reason with this child. I'm also amazed at how stupid some parents are. I'm not an expert on parenting, but it doesn't seem like the ability to reason is something a two year old would have a grasp on. By the time this mother decided to take the appropriate action and take her child outside I'd already given her that "you're disturbing me" look, gotten up to get a to-go box, packaged my food and was leaving. An elderly Asian couple looked on in horror as well clearly debating if they should get up and move to the other end of the restaurant.

I recently read about several restaurants becoming "no-child restaurants." I think it's a fantastic idea. What I don't understand is why so many rude parents feel they have the right to ruin someone's meal because of their out-of-control screaming child. Whatever happened to hiring a babysitter? This was a really popular concept when I was growing up. I was left many many times with a babysitter when my parents went out, and it was a perfectly good experience. Considering this all took place in Santa Monica where the median house price is over a million dollars, I think these f0-something looking parents could've afforded a babysitter. Unfortunately, that would make way too much sense and be way too considerate of others. Clearly, they're all about the  cavalier, selfish, "me" attitude that is so prevalent in L.A.

I realize that I shouldn't have left. I should have done just what the Asian couple was debating doing and gotten up and moved the other side of the restaurant. If I couldn't have gotten any peace and quiet, I should've said something to the parents, but I've never been one for confrontation so I just left. I would like to give a shout-out though. To the two rude, selfish parents at The Veggie Grill this evening with your shrieking, screaming toddler, thanks for ruining a single girl's night out.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Bread That Won't Cause Bloating


A few years ago I began having trouble maintaining my weight. I thought it was a result of turning thirty and  thus, a slower metabolism. Nonetheless, I was determined to maintain my weight and sought the help of a dietitian. She gave me a lot of good advice, the kind you never want to take. Things like eliminate soda, work out six days a week, drink only water or tea, eliminate bread and the majority of carbohydrates.

I began this miserable diet but struggled to eliminate bread. Bread has been around since the beginning of time. How could I abandon my beloved grain? As time went on, working out six days a week reinvigorated my metabolism. I wish I could say I'd kept that strenuous pace up, but I haven't.

What I discovered was that I didn't have a problem with weight maintenance as much as I did with bloating. From the elimination diet the dietitian recommended I finally was able to see what was causing the problem. It wasn't other carbohydrates like rice, it was bread.

After a week or two with no bread, I simply couldn't give it up so I began a quest for a bread that wouldn't cause bloating. The best tasting breads caused bloating but so did the worst, you know, the ones that are 100% whole wheat with zero sugar and taste so unappealing I'm surprised they even call it bread.

Then I discovered Trader Joe's Sprouted Flourless Whole Wheat Berry Bread. This bread is miracle bread. I can eat as much of it as I want and never bloat. The reality is I probably eat a maximum of four slices in a day. It's also a wonder bread at only 80 calories a slice. It isn't the best or worst tasting bread, but it's good enough to be palatable. If you love bread but suffer from bloating, this bread might be the answer you've been searching for.

Monday, July 25, 2011

RedBox: Broken Machines, Inefficient Customer Service

I welcomed Red Box DVD kiosks when I first saw them popping up. Getting a DVD for $1 dollar seemed like a great idea even though the customer has to do the work of driving to pick up and drop off the DVD. Even when gas hit $4 dollars a gallon I still thought Red Box was a great concept.

However, due to their frequently broken machines and inefficient customer service I once again desperate to find an alternative. The movie studios wonder why people pirate movies. I'm beginning to understand because the frustration I've gone through to pay to watch a DVD is simply ridiculous. I began with Blockbuster Online and then moved to Netflix. What I found with both companies is that they throttle the DVD's and do not order enough new releases. Hence, even though I was paying for 3 DVD's at a time, I rarely ever had three DVD's at a time because both Blockbuster and Netflix would blame the USPS for the ridiculously long wait time to receive and return a DVD. Also, when new releases came out they wouldn't be available to rent because the companies ordered limited quantities. By the time I received a new release it was no longer a new release.

Needless to say I was thrilled when Red Box came along until the first time I was unable to return a DVD because the machine was broken. What Red Box should have is a mailing address for emergency situations when the machines are broken where the customer can go to the Red Box website, print off a bulk mail postage label, slip the DVD into and envelope and mail it back to them. Rex Box does not have such a service. It was irritating the first time I encountered a broken machine because I had to drive to another location to return the DVD.

If I thought Red Box's broken machines were annoying the first time I was in for an unpleasant surprise the second time. I attempted to return a Red Box DVD, and the machine was broken. Annoyed, I got in my car and drove to another location where that machine was also broken. I called Red Box customer service. The only option I had was to receive a refund, which would take 5 to 7 days to process, and try to return it again the following day. The following day I went back to the second location to return the DVD. The machine was still broken. I called customer service and asked if they could give me a location where there was a working machine. The customer service representative told me the first location I'd rented from was working. I drove to that location, and this machine was also still broken! I called customer service a third time and got no where. Customer service is absolutely useless. The bottom line is that you have to keep driving around until you find a kiosk that is not broken to return your DVD. The best customer service can do is offer you codes for free movies because really, what I want to do when I'm in the process of making my FIFTH attempt to return a DVD, is rent another one!!!

What I did find out is that representatives cannot re-boot the machines from a remote location. It's incomprehensible to me why they do not have this technology when I've had tech support from India control my computer from a remote location to fix computer issues with my desktop. Apparently, Red Box kiosks have the technology capabilities of a Coke machine from the 1980's. Therefore, a technician must come out to repair them, which takes 24-48 hours. It would've been really helpful to know that when I'd tried to return the DVD to the same location the following day.

The most hair-raising part of Red Box's dodgy customer service is their cue-card style customer service. "I'm sorry that you were unable to return your Red Box DVD. I know how frustrating that can be..." Really?! Do you really know how frustrated I am?!!! I don't think so! I made FIVE attempts to THREE locations to return  one DVD over a two day period!!! Red Box is not cheap convenience; it's guaranteed insanity as far as I'm concerned.

Once again, I'm desperate for a DVD rental solution. I don't have an X-Box to channel Video-on-Demand into my television, and I don't particularly want to buy one. I do have several Starz channels free for a year. I notice they play a lot of the newer movies. Maybe I should start checking the TV guide more often and save myself the gas and sanity that Red Box has been robbing me of!

This Glamorous Trash